Margaret Cho's Puppy of EEEEEEVILLLLL

Michelle Malkin and all the other repubs apparently have way too much time on their hands, now that they're trying to avoid all that pesky Rove/Plame stuff in the news. No, they're too busy uncovering yet more proof that all liberals are anti-American enemy combatant terrorists bents on murdering every true blue... er... red American.

And what is this smoking gun they've unearthed? It's... Margaret Cho's dog, Gudrun.

Gudrun Ensslin. The Red Army Faction, AKA the Baader-Meinhof Gang. Slaughterers of scores. Chic art figures of the American left's pop cultural icons -- who are in turn themselves admired by the animating personalities of the modern Democratic Party. A minor point, naming one's dog after a terrorist, and lauding those who do? Yes. But a helpful reminder nonetheless of a phrase worth remembering: they're not antiwar -- just on the other side.

At least there's one sane conservative - one of the commenters on this page took Josh Trevino to task (and rather intelligently I must admit) for posting something so bizarrely inane:

Pointless

With all due respect, what exactly is the point of this post? I'm scratching my head tryin' to figure it out.

Here is what I think you might be tryin' to say:

Anti-War activists are traitors ("the other side")

Moulitsas supports terrorists because he admires Cho who named her dog after a terrorist. Democrats admire the "left's pop cultural icons" who themselves have the Red Army Faction as "chic art figures" and therefore Democrats admire terrorists.

All this actually brings to light what a great tragedy the Bush presidency has been. Bush had an opportunity for greatness. Less than 5 years later look at us now. Petty bickering, parsing of inconsequential details for nothing more than the sake of a great big "Gotcha!".

This is all moral relavatism run rampant. Not good.

By: Vivid

So what's Malkin's excuse for her amazing failure of common sense?



Malkin: http://michellemalkin.com/archives/003028.htm
Original from RedState: http://www.redstate.org/story/2005/7/15/143658/866



Oh, yeah. And from one of the RedState posters, responding to Trevino's rather silly allegations: I await your substantive diary of the day No sarcasm. I have been reading less and less, especially since the Rove/Plame/Wilson thing does not interest me. By: Adam C

*rollseyes*